.png){kind=logo}
Don’t Fly Blind: How Payers Can Balance HIPAA Compliance and Marketing Performance
Healthcare marketers face an impossible choice right now: comply with privacy regulations and lose marketing visibility, or risk non-compliance to maintain performance. HIPAA, state privacy laws, the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), wiretapping statutes, and more are driving healthcare organizations to remove analytics platforms like Google Analytics and ad trackers such as Meta Pixel and Google’s conversion tags. While this protects member data, it also leaves marketers with limited visibility into their campaigns, making it harder to optimize ad spend and measure results.
Without these tracking tools, payer marketing teams are seeing a significant increase in costs, a decline in efficiency, and difficulty justifying marketing investments. Some marketers have experienced a 70% increase in Cost Per Lead (CPL) after removing tracking pixels, making it unsustainable to run digital campaigns at scale.
The Compliance-Performance Dilemma
The consequences of this dilemma became strikingly clear in April 2024, when Kaiser Permanente announced a data breach affecting 13.4 million health plan members. This breach was caused by tracking technologies inadvertently sharing sensitive member information, such as names, IP addresses, and online interactions, with third-party vendors.
Kaiser isn’t alone. In the past few years, several major healthcare payers have faced legal action due to their use of tracking technologies like Meta Pixel, Google Analytics, and TikTok’s pixel:
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts is facing a class-action lawsuit alleging that their use of pixels and analytics tools on patient portals shared personal health information with advertisers—potentially violating HIPAA, wiretap laws, and Massachusetts privacy statutes.
- HealthPartners agreed to a $6 million settlement in 2024 over claims that its use of Meta Pixel and other trackers transmitted health data to advertisers without consent.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (Federal Employee Program) is being sued for embedding TikTok's tracking pixel, which allegedly exposed sensitive health-related user interactions.
- Vision Service Plan (VSP) was hit with a class-action lawsuit in late 2024 for using marketing pixels that shared website activity with Meta and Google.
These lawsuits show that the risk isn’t hypothetical. The use of tracking tools on payer websites is under intense scrutiny—from regulators, attorneys general, and class-action lawyers alike.
By proactively announcing its breach, Kaiser Permanente acknowledged the serious legal implications of failing to comply with federal and state privacy notification requirements. Beyond potential HIPAA violations, healthcare organizations like Kaiser face additional risks:
- FTC Enforcement: The Federal Trade Commission has actively pursued healthcare organizations for privacy violations, imposing multimillion-dollar fines and, in some cases, banning the use of critical ad tracking tools entirely.
- State-Level Enforcement: With more than 20 states implementing stringent privacy laws, healthcare organizations must navigate a complex regulatory landscape or risk severe penalties.
- Class-Action Lawsuits: Lawyers actively monitor healthcare websites for privacy violations. Even practices that fall short of explicit HIPAA violations can trigger substantial financial penalties through class-action lawsuits.
Kaiser’s transparent response demonstrates how proactive compliance can mitigate risk and limit both legal and reputational damage, but this created another problem. As a result of the breach, Kaiser removed the tracking technologies from its websites and apps. And as we mentioned earlier, that can significantly impact marketing performance.
The Cost of Removing Web Trackers
Digital advertising platforms like Google and Facebook optimize ad performance by using conversion data. When this data is removed, advertising algorithms struggle to target the right audiences, leading to:
- Higher CPL and Cost Per Acquisition (CPA): Without data to optimize campaigns, payer marketers see a dramatic increase in costs.
- Inefficient Marketing Spend: Without insights, marketing teams are left guessing which strategies are working, leading to wasted budget.
- Limited Campaign Visibility: Marketers lose the ability to track conversions and measure success, making it harder to secure future budget approvals.
This dilemma is not just theoretical. Several healthcare organizations have faced significant challenges after removing ad trackers:
- Heartland Dental: Experienced an 8x increase in Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) after removing ad pixels. Restoring the data loop with Freshpaint brought their CAC back to baseline.
- Allergy Partners: Saw their CPL jump to $300 after removing tracking pixels. Upon adopting Freshpaint, their CPL dropped back to $12.
- BU Dental: Observed a decrease in CPL from $13 to $9 after implementing Freshpaint.
- A Behavioral Healthcare Provider: Experienced a spike in Cost-Per-Acquisition (CPA), which dropped by 70% post-Freshpaint implementation.
- A Top-Ranked Specialty Hospital: Witnessed a 50% reduction in Cost Per Click (CPC) upon implementing Freshpaint to restore data to their ad platforms.
This is more than just a marketing challenge. It’s a business-critical issue. Member acquisition, engagement, and retention rely on efficient digital advertising. Without performance data, payers risk overspending or missing key opportunities to connect with their target audience.
Compliance Doesn't Have to Mean Marketing Blindness
If this is the first you’re hearing of these risks, you’re not alone. We recently partnered with Becker’s Hospital Review to survey healthcare payers about their privacy practices and found that 76% of payers overlook privacy risks.
Fortunately, there’s a clear path forward: a Privacy-First Framework to protect both marketing ROI and member PHI—an approach one nonprofit health plan successfully adopted. It includes five critical steps:
1) Audit
Begin by compiling a comprehensive inventory of all tracking technologies deployed on your website and applications. This requires collaboration across departments—marketing, product, IT, and legal—to identify tools that may have been added without centralized oversight.
2) Analyze
Evaluate each identified tool to determine if it collects Protected Health Information (PHI). Remember, even seemingly innocuous data can be considered PHI when combined with health-related information.
3) Verify
For tools that handle PHI, verify that you have a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) in place. These agreements are legally required under HIPAA to safeguard PHI when shared with third-party vendors. If you don’t have a BAA in place, you will need to add a tool to your Martech stack to help you govern your marketing data.
4) Govern
Implement controls to manage the data shared with third-party tools, especially those without BAAs. This may involve configuring settings to limit data transmission or employing technologies that anonymize or de-identify PHI before it's shared.
5) Continuous Monitoring
Establish ongoing surveillance of your digital properties to detect and assess new tracking technologies. Regular monitoring ensures that any additions comply with HIPAA standards and do not inadvertently expose PHI.
By implementing this Privacy-First Framework, healthcare organizations can effectively balance regulatory compliance and marketing performance. This structured approach not only protects patient data but also sustains the efficacy of marketing initiatives in a highly regulated environment.
Compliance Without Compromise
Healthcare marketers shouldn't have to sacrifice performance for compliance. But, ignoring privacy regulations in the name of performance is an extremely risky approach. And removing web trackers isn't the answer either, as it severely undermines marketing efficiency and escalates costs.
By adopting a Privacy-First Framework, and pairing it with a tool like Freshpaint, payers can strike the right balance. Organizations can protect sensitive patient data, reduce legal risks, and still run effective, data-driven marketing campaigns.
Compliance doesn’t have to mean flying blind. It’s about being proactive, strategic, and prepared.
